M.A. Thesis:

A Comparative Study of Iran-France Criminal Policy on Road Traffic Crime

In the division of crimes, driving crimes are considered as minor crimes that have been answered in different countries in the criminal policy of the state. First, the policy of decriminalization and non-refoulement of the performance guarantee, which includes the policy of imprisonment, can be, for example, The bill of the Social Penal Code replaces the prison; Second, the policy of coping and rigor: This second type applies to offenses of public order. In Iran's criminal policy, both approaches can be seen; in the Social Penalty Bill, most of the driving offenses are mentioned in the group of crimes that need to be detained; on the other hand, the new law on driving offenses, the exaggeration of fines and deprivations is foreseen Is. Three dominant ideas in contemporary French criminal policy include increased crime, internationalization of delinquency, human rights defenses. In accordance with Articles 3 to 6 of the law of 5 July 1985, Droid may invoke his fault in order to reject or reduce compensation for the loss suffered. According to them, according to the law, the lost drivers are in a worse situation than before 1985, because they were able to claim damages on the basis of clause 1 of Article 1384 of the Civil Code, without being guilty of any allegation against them. Except for the fault that was unpredictable for the car owner.

Keywords: Criminal policy, Iran, France, traffic offenses