Thesis:

Examining the limits of the court's intervention in the arbitrator's decision in the law and judicial procedure

Arbitration is a quasi-judicial and legal method and its purpose is to resolve legal disputes due to many benefits such as; Preservation of the interests of the parties, better efficiency and justice, confidentiality of arbitration, peaceful resolution of disputes, the possibility of quick and better execution of rulings and speed in resolving disputes, etc. This issue has been taken into consideration in most legal systems by establishing articles related to the intervention of courts in its process and by passing independent laws. In this research, we are trying to examine the limits of the court's intervention in the arbitrator's decision in the law and judicial procedure. The existing laws in Iran are not explicitly stated in connection with arbitration, but by prescribing the legislator and referring some lawsuits to arbitration, it can be seen that the legislator has implicitly accepted the principle of non-interference of courts in arbitration. As a result, in cases where the law is silent and not clear, such as; The authority of the arbitrator to issue temporary and protective orders, assuming the existence of an arbitration agreement, to issue an order not to hear the lawsuit by the court, the authority of the arbitration authority to deal with the proof of the lawsuit, etc., has caused undue interference of the courts in the arbitration process, so it is necessary and necessary to the extent We should examine the intervention of the court in the arbitrator's decision in the law and judicial procedure and try to solve them by identifying the legal gaps. The research method in this research is descriptive and analytical using library tools. Therefore, the intervention of the courts before arbitration includes; Interference regarding the arbitration contract, interference in the appointment of the arbitrator, interference in the replacement and replacement of the arbitrator. The intervention of the court in the arbitration is; Interference in security measures, interference in the study of reasons, interference in the arbitrator's injury, and interference in the delivery of documents. The intervention of the courts after the issuance of the arbitration award includes; Interference in correcting, completing and interpreting the vote, interference in the validity of the vote, interference in the implementation of the vote.

Keywords: Keywords: arbitration, court intervention, supervision, assistance, arbitrator's decision, law, judicial procedure