Thesis:

Comparative comparison of criminalization of state crimes in individualist and collectivist government systems

State crimes in individualistic and collectivist systems is an analytical and theoretical issue that has not been researched so far, and the crimes committed by governments have been discussed, which are examined from both individual and collective aspects. Governments' encroachment on the fundamental rights of the nation in the form of violation of the fundamental rights of citizens and areas related to health, health, treatment and education can be considered as examples of state crime. Government crime refers to seemingly legal behaviors of governments that do not imply individual and personal benefit and are capable of causing public harm. These crimes, despite their importance and the ability to cause irreparable losses to citizens, have not been criminalized in many cases, and criminal policymaking is facing problems and obstacles. This article discusses and examines the necessary tools for adopting criminal policy, considering the requirements of criminal policy regarding state crimes. Criminal policy requirements in the field of state crimes include "public policy requirements" and "legislative requirements". Based on this, the necessity of the legitimacy of the political system, the application of a law-based political structure, the intervention of civil institutions, the constitutional and extraconstitutional supervision over the functioning of the government, refusing to pay attention only to political rationality in the legislative process and paying attention to the acceptability and rule of law are necessary. Criminal policy is in the field of state crimes.

Keywords: state crimes, individualistic legal system, collectivist legal system