M.A. Thesis:

A Comparative Study of the Rights of Immigrants in Iran and Egypt

Termination of marriage is one of the ways to break up a marriage. When, for some reason, marriage causes great harm to one of the parties, in order to free him from the shackles of marriage, the marriage can be terminated under certain conditions. Marriage termination does not have the difficulties and limitations of divorce. In a marriage contract, the parties or one of them cannot consider the right to terminate the marriage. In other words, the marriage contract is necessary, but there are limited and unique cases in this regard. If there are defects such as leprosy, leprosy, blindness in the wife, the man can terminate the marriage, but if there are these defects in the husband, the wife has no right to terminate. In addition to the fact that there is no convincing reason for this discrimination, there is also the objection that, given the scientific progress, if the disease is treatable, the right to terminate the couple should not remain and because there is no text in civil law. There is disagreement over the preservation of the truth. According to the Shiite jurists and Sunni religions, there is no difference between couples in terminating a marriage due to the same defects. Under Egyptian personal law, couples have the same right to terminate a marriage as a result of harmful defects and to prevent enjoyment and abhorrence. The purpose of this comparative study is the aspects of marriage termination in Iranian and Egyptian law. In this dissertation, using analytical and descriptive methods, jurisprudential and legal principles of marriage termination .in Iranian and Egyptian law have been studied comparatively

Keywords: Marriage termination, Iranian law, Egyptian law, Islamic jurisprudence.