M.A. Thesis:

Comparative Study on the Dissolution of Engagement in Civil Rights in Iran and Kamenla

A nomination is a cancellable contract and, with the explicit consent of the law of each party, can terminate it until the time of conclusion of the contract, and is not expressly required by this contract, even if an agreement is contrary to the customary Such an agreement is void and is opposed to public order. The promise of marriage does not create the paternity principle, so it is legally possible for any person to sue another candidate, although it is forbidden to sue another candidate from the point of view of jurisprudence and law, but if the contract is concluded, the verdict on the correctness of the award The correctness of the contract has been issued. In the nomination for demanding compelling claims in Iranian law, it is not possible to remove Article 1036 of the Civil Code, but in general law, with the theory of the principle of pride and misuse of rights, one can claim the damage caused by the collapse of the nomination.. It is possible to retrieve gifts in the law of Iran and Kamenla by marrying marriage. The basis for the extraction of gifts The nomination in Iranian law is conditional gifts. The introduction of this theory by the lawyers of Iran due to the ineffectiveness of the theory of termination leads to the conclusion of a contract, but in general law, besides the theory of conditional gifts, the theory of deceit and the theory of unfair possession are also cited as the basis for the repayment of nominations.

Keywords: Engagement, Iranian Civil Rights, Kamenla, Liquidation