M.A. Thesis:

Comparative Comparison of Oath and Its Effect in Proving and Disposing Claims in Jurisprudence and Islamic Laws of Iran and Pakistan

An oath in court means that a person proves God to prove his integrity and the accuracy of his statements, thereby proving his claim or resorting to it in his defense and in proving that the claims of the claimant are plausible. . The oath of law in Iran is one of the proofs that the recognition, respect and observance of religion are based on religious ordinances rather than on the basis of the custom. The material provisions of this reason are based on the Fataw of the jurisprudents in civil law. These provisions are repeated with minor but tangible differences in the Civil Procedure Law. The recent law, in addition to aspects of the use of this reason in civil proceedings, has apparently expanded its scope of application. Considering the jurisprudential views on the use of this reason, it also confirms this notion. The oath is a ceremonial, sole and special reason for the parties, which is only possible in the case of God-believers. The verdict of being and attributing the act of the oath will create interesting and complicated issues. In addition, by examining the claims that can be used in oath, it can be concluded that, in spite of legal changes, in essence, the oath is in fact used in cases where the testimony of witnesses can prove them and such claims in comparison with the claims Verifiable by oath. Some claims are not proven by the need to prove them for specific reasons by testimony of intuition and oath, and their recognition is of major importance

Keywords: , oath, proofs, Iranian law, Pakistani rights