Thesis:

Criticism and Criminological Analysis of Farajah's Plans to Combat the Lack of Hijab

This study aims to critically examine the criminological aspects of the initiatives implemented by FARAJA (Iran's Law Enforcement Command) in combating improper veiling. Criminological analysis of FARAJA’s initiatives—such as the Guidance Patrol, Nazer Plan, SMS notifications from the Moral Security Police, and the Noor Plan—reveals that these measures face significant legal, social, and operational challenges. These challenges include: - Legal inconsistencies, such as lack of alignment with existing laws - Violations of civil rights, including infringement on individual freedoms - Negative impacts on social security, potentially increasing public tension Some experts argue that the punitive methods employed—such as imposing penalties without due legal process—contradict judicial and legal principles. For instance, delegating the authority to penalize improper veiling to FARAJA under the Hijab and Chastity Bill is considered unconstitutional. Certain actions by FARAJA, especially in data collection and enforcement of restrictions, are viewed as infringements on civil liberties and personal freedoms. The implementation of these plans may escalate social tensions and threaten public safety. Moreover, due to limitations in resources and personnel, some initiatives are not fully executable and have limited impact. Raising public awareness about the significance of hijab, as well as citizens’ rights and responsibilities, could help reduce conflict and tension. Considering alternative approaches, such as education and cultural development instead of harsh punitive measures, may contribute to mitigating social harm.

Keywords: Keywords: Criminology, FARAJA initiatives, combating improper veiling, civil rights, individual free