Thesis:

Jurisprudential-legal examination of hijab-related crimes with emphasis on hejab and chastity bill

In Islamic law, especially in Imami jurisprudence and related laws of the Islamic Republic of Iran, the issue of hijab and chastity has been paid attention to. In a way that hijab as a Shariah ruling is agreed upon by all Islamic jurists. In Islamic countries, there are laws in this regard, and in Iranian laws (both general and special laws), regulations have been established in this regard, examples of which are (commentary to Article 864 of the Islamic Penal Code approved in 2013) and the Hijab and Chastity Bill. . This research has been done with the aim of jurisprudential-legal investigation of hijab-related crimes with an emphasis on the hijab and chastity bill and in a library method. The results show that the text of the bill to support the family through promoting the culture of chastity and hijab, approved by the Judicial and Legal Commission of the Islamic Council, was published. In this bill, 70 articles of the duties of various institutions to promote chastity and hijab have been specified. In the case of dealing with veiling, the steps are as follows: first is the warning phase, after the warning phase, the penalty phase is considered, so the fine should neither be so low that it is ineffective and not deter, nor should it be so high that it is considered unreasonable. In this bill, the jurisprudential and shari'a standards of hijab have been violated. In this regard, it is enough to note that first of all, the rules of Sharia clothing are clear in jurisprudence books and the Iranian society is fully aware of it. These regulations have been violated and ignored in various articles of this law, and therefore this bill cannot have a commitment to jurisprudence regulations and claim that it has been approved to revive the regulations of jurisprudence in the field of covering. While in traditional jurisprudence, there have been many exceptions for the use of veils by women in Islamic society, such as religious minority women, rural women, or perhaps the same workers who are called "blue-collar workers" in today's terminology, and even women who are under age conditions. are special; Therefore, it can be seen that the provisions of this bill not only do not commit to the rules of hijab jurisprudence, but in terms of comprehensiveness and hindrance, they have moved the boundaries of the sharia hijab and introduced other rules and based on other interests. Key words: jurisprudence-law, crime, hijab, hijab and chastity bill.

Keywords: jurisprudence-law, crime, hijab, hijab and chastity