Thesis:

Alternatives to imprisonment in Iranian and Egyptian law

In this research, the debate related to alternatives to imprisonment in Iranian and Egyptian law has been investigated. Iran's criminal lawmaker does not follow a specific criminal policy in the field of alternatives to imprisonment, because on the one hand, he has provided a monetary penalty for avoiding imprisonment, and on the other hand, in case the convicted person is unable to pay the monetary penalty, they issue a sentence of detention in prison. Useful and effective implementation of alternative methods of imprisonment requires a clear and complete law, as well as creating the necessary culture among the responsible institutions involved in the selection and implementation of these methods. De-incarceration is used in Egyptian law as one of the legal tools to obtain individual rights. This action means removing or canceling the imprisonment or enforcing the prison sentence in certain cases. Parole in Egypt may be subject to various legal conditions and provisions, including consent to punishment, bail, or related requests. In Egyptian law, the concept of parole is known as "probation" or "parole". The laws related to this matter are stipulated in Article 689 of the Egyptian Crimes Bill and the laws related to criminal and judicial punishments, as a means to reduce prison sentences and improve the welfare and behavior of criminals. In Iran, examples of decriminalization may include violations of national security, propaganda against the regime, and destruction of economic performance. In Egypt, jailbreaks may be for violating government security, engaging in terrorist activities, and spreading false and unsafe news.

Keywords: alternative to imprisonment, punishment of imprisonment, rehabilitation, law of Iran and Egyp