Thesis:

Analyzing the views of jurists regarding false and emerging mysticism and true mysticism

The knowledge of jurisprudence, as a science derived from Sharia, has always been one of the most important and effective Islamic sciences, because all the worldly relations and actions of Muslims in the field of jurisprudence have a specific ruling. One of the sciences that is of special importance from the point of view of jurisprudence is the knowledge of mysticism, both in terms of theoretical mysticism and practical mysticism. One of the stances of jurisprudence towards mysticism is dealing with false and emerging mysticisms and expressing their equality with true mysticism. The results of the current research, which was conducted in a descriptive-analytical way, show that the opinions and thoughts of deviants have two general dimensions; 1. The atheist dimension and 2. The non-theistic dimension. The atheist dimension includes things such as: belief in the divinity of the Holy Prophet (PBUH) and his family, belief in being a partner with God in divinity and creation, belief in dissolution, reincarnation, likeness and embodiment, etc. The non-atheist dimension also includes things It is because: delegation of knowledge and power of imams, falsification, heresy, etc., in both aspects, jurists have expressed their views and opinions. Based on the point of view of jurists, the tendency towards false mysticism is rejected by relying on three jurisprudential evidences: From the point of view of Imamiyyah jurists, holding and promoting false mysticism is forbidden due to the sanctity of innovation and legislation and the rule of negation of mustache. Also, from the point of view of Imamiyyah jurists, it is forbidden to be attracted to and join false mystics according to the jurisprudential rule of sanctity being similar to infidels, as well as the evidence of the need to acquire correct beliefs and the evidence of the need to acquire correct behavior. Also, from the point of view of Imamiyyah jurists, based on the jurisprudential rule of the sanctity of preserving lost books, any kind of preservation, publication and study of works related to false mysticism is forbidden.

Keywords: jurisprudence, false and emerging mysticism, true mysticism