Thesis:

A comparative study of the nature of money in Khamsa schools from the point of view of jurisprudence and law

Diyeh is one of the most important rulings and controversial issues in Islamic jurisprudence and law, which has received the attention of Islamic experts, jurists, commentators and jurists from various aspects. Diyeh, and whether they are determined or optional, the role of error or intentionality of the crime in the amount of Diyeh, days that cause the concentration of Diyeh, female Diyeh, rejection of male Diyeh, and the philosophy and wisdom of halving the female Diyeh. In this direction, to reach the concept and nature of diya from the point of view of jurisprudence and Islamic law, it is more correct to say the word in this regard. Examining Khamsa religions shows the inequality of Muslims and non-Muslims in the amount of dowry. Diyeh issue is one of the issues that happened as a result of the exigencies of the time, which before now, there was no need to answer and solve it, but with the passage of time, it has become an important and fundamental issue. In this research, descriptive method and library sources were used. In this connection, the rules of religions Khamsa was examined about the payment of the soul and the members, and the views of each of the famous jurists of these schools were expressed. The results show that Shafi'i believes in one-third of self-payment, Maliki in half of Dhimmiun, Abu Hanifa believes in equality of Muslims. While the jurists of Imamiyyah have defined the dowry of a bookish man equal to eight hundred dirhams and the dowry of a bookish woman as four hundred dirhams. Based on this, some jurists of the Imamiyyah have considered non-Muslims' money to be the same as Muslims' money according to the circumstances

Keywords: the nature of Diya, Khamsa religions, jurisprudence and law