M.A. Thesis:

A comparative study of cases stop implementation of civilan sentences in Iranian and French rights

A comparative study of cases of suspension and suspension of the execution of judgments in the civill laws of iran and France has been carried out with the aim of identifying the flaws in the execution of civill judgments in Iran and offering a proposal to improve the exercise of sovereignty in the Country’s judicial System. The suspension and suspension of the execution of the judgment is a subject that is dealt with in Article 24 of the law on the execution of civill judgments approved in 1356 and the interpretations of this article show that in many cases there is the possibility of suspension and suspension of the execution of the judgments, which causes confusin for litigants and sometimes the judicial legal system. Based on the opinion of the great legal scholars of the country. Iran’s legal system in general and this civill procedure in particular have been influenced by the rules and regulations of French civill procedure. French law in general and the civill procedure codes of 1806 and 1975 in parficular are considered on important and reliable source for Iran’s legal system and judicial system. The constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran is also adapted from the Frech Constitution. Comparative research on the laws that have influenced each other, can help to Solve some shortcomings in the formulation and revision of laws. In this situation when the 7th development plan of the our country was announced and the judicial reform document is being implemented, and the ipinion of the head of the judicial system is on the continuation of the reform in the country’s judicial system Reserches, including comparative studies, will be effective in the direction of the transformational programs of the judicial system and, accordingly, the application of correct judicial governace.

Keywords: Stop/implementation of civill sentences/Iranian law / French law